This question already has an answer here:


Sense of agency From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The "sense of agency" (SA) refers to the subjective awareness that one is initiating, executing, and controlling one's own volitional actions in the world.[1] It is the pre-reflective awareness or implicit sense that it is I who is executing bodily movement(s) or thinking thoughts. In normal, non-pathological experience, the SA is tightly integrated with one's "sense of ownership" (SO), which is the pre-reflective awareness or implicit sense that one is the owner of an action, movement or thought. If someone else were to move your arm (while you remained passive) you would certainly have sensed that it were your arm that moved and thus a sense of ownership (SO) for that movement. However, you would not have felt that you were the author of the movement; you would not have a sense of agency (SA).[2]

Normally SA and SO are tightly integrated, such that while typing one has an enduring, embodied, and tacit sense that "my own fingers are doing the moving" (SO) and that "the typing movements are controlled (or volitionally directed) by me" (SA). In patients suffering from certain forms of pathological experience (i.e., schizophrenia) the integration of SA and SO may become disrupted in some manner. In this case, movements may be executed or thoughts made manifest, for which the schizophrenic patient has a sense of ownership, but not a sense of agency.

Regarding SA for both motor movements and thoughts, further distinctions may be found in both first-order (immediate, pre-reflective) experience[3] and higher-order (reflective or introspective) consciousness.[4] For example, while typing I have a sense of control and thus SA for the on-going action of typing; this is an example of SA in first-order experience which is immediate and prior to any explicit intellectual reflection upon the typing actions themselves. In this case, I am not focusing on the typing movements per se but rather, I am involved with the task at hand. If I'm subsequently asked if I just performed the action of typing, I can correctly attribute agency to myself. This is an example of a higher-order, reflective, conscious "attribution" of agency, which is a derivative notion stemming from the immediate, pre-reflective "sense" of agency.

marked as duplicate by commando, virmaior, iphigenie, Hunan Rostomyan, shane May 2 '14 at 20:45

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • no, not duplicate – felino May 2 '14 at 17:53
  • 1
    Please you paragraphs in your question for readability. Also, I am not entirely sure what you are asking. Alos, what is the last bit suppose to mean? Are you quoting "j. krishnamurti", if so, where? – k0pernikus May 2 '14 at 18:19
  • @k0pernikus - I think that's himself... – virmaior May 9 '14 at 9:15
  • you are stupid by marking this as duplicate. your stupidity prevents me from posting or making intelligent questions. – felino Jul 12 '14 at 23:15

Reading the full text from Discours de la Methode, it's not clear that Descartes is claiming that the self generates thought or that thought generates self (or that the direction of which causes the other is what's important). What he is claiming is that because there is thought, there must be a subject doing the thinking.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.