2

What does process philosophy contribute to cognitive science?

Is it newer constructs, hypotheses, or something else?

1
  • I'd say primarily (the form of) an ontology, so surely the "constructs", but that means the very terms of the problem, in other words its "matter", where the "matter" here is "processes". For example, <<There is no mind-matter duality in this ontology>> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… -- I would convert that into an answer, if that's enough (simple question, simple answer): or, would you have any specific doubts? Commented May 11 at 10:26

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .