Aside from overcoming the Fallacy of Four Terms, what were the major contributions of Stoic syllogisms? What did they provide that Aristotelian syllogisms could not? And, what were their major limitations?

  • I don't know about syllogisms - but they developed modal logic more fully – Mozibur Ullah Jun 20 '14 at 17:39

One of the limitations of the Stoics is that they did not "grasp as clearly as Aristotle the formal nature of invalidity." Ian Mueller pointed this out in a famous article on Stoic Logic. His argument was that they merely provided a framework to settle inferential validity and reveal those questions that fall outside logic (such as soundness questions related to metaphysics implied by the premises).

  • Could you at least cite the article? – Kevin Holmes Jun 20 '14 at 13:13
  • 1
    Ian Mueller. "An Introduction to Stoic Logic." in John M. Rist (ed.). "The Stoics." University of California Press, 1978. – user155194 Jun 20 '14 at 13:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.