Should a king be restrict to marry a queen that is also a philosopher in Plato's point of view?

I know that the king had big power and should be a philosopher in Plato's view. If the queen have some power also, must she also be a philosopher too?

  • 2
    If one member of a couple is a philosopher, perhaps the other one should be a stenographer. Otherwise they'd spend all their time talking to each other and never write anything down. – user4894 Jun 28 '14 at 0:58

In the Republic Plato claimed that the idea of marriage was a "natural enemy" of the "commonwealth," aiming for its own higher unity. He thinks that a king should not marry nor should he engage in sexual conduct while he is king, as it is a distraction from the 24/7 job of ruling, and to lack the wisdom and self-control necessary to avoid sexual temptation is unbecoming of a man who holds the highest of stations. I dont believe he mentions queens and in his view they would be unnecessary, yet he doesnt explicitly discount the possibility of the rule of a sole unmarried philosopher queen. He does speak of a kind of eugenics where temporary marriages are arranged by the rulers, and an allowance of promiscuity at retirement as a reward for a lifetime of service to the republic.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.