0

What does Sartre mean with that existence precedes essence and how is it related to the earlier existential philosophers' thoughts?

Existential philosophers like Kirkegaard, Heideggers and Friedrich Nietzsche?

  • 2
    Is there any chance you could share a little more about why this might have become an interesting or important problem in your study of philosophy? What hypotheses have you formed and what has your research turned up so far? – Joseph Weissman Jan 13 '15 at 18:32
1

Existence precedes essence means human beings are not defined by an a priori nature. Rather, what's fundamental about us is that we exist. This stands in contrast to traditional philosophies and theologies which claimed people had an essence (e.g. man is a reasoning animal, man has a divine spark, etc...).

Bare existence lacks meaning, as such we are faced with dread, awe, and to believe in something greater requires a leap of faith (Kierkegaard), for we don't have the comfort of "knowing" what to do. Additionally, the lack of meaning invites nihilism, atheism, iconoclasm and of course freedom and its implications on morality, and this is where Nietzsche comes in.

Furthermore, bare existence is about consciousness, and as such about being in the world, phenomenology, how we relate to time. Heidegger figures prominently here.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.