-3

If one religion is true, why wouldn't everybody would believe it?

As there are multiple religions, does that mean that none of them are correct. Or is my leading statement wrong, and one or more could be correct?

closed as unclear what you're asking by stoicfury Feb 15 '15 at 18:14

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
  • 1
    As the different streams having their sources in different places all mingle their waters in the sea, so, O Lord, the different paths which men take through different tendencies, various though they appear, crooked or straight, all lead to Thee." Mahimnah-stotra. – Swami Vishwananda Feb 15 '15 at 6:31
  • Any downvote reasons? – Tim Feb 15 '15 at 9:02
  • You're going to have to prove why you think that because something is true, everyone would believe it. Flat-earthers still exist, science is extremely political these days, and not everyone lives in a first world country. – user13705 Feb 15 '15 at 10:07
  • 1
    I didn't downvote, but I'm closing because it's unclear what you are asking. Each question you ask is clear, but you ask 3 distinct questions. "Why are there so many religions" is a history or social psych question, off-topic here. "If one religion is true, why wouldn't everyone believe it?" is too broad without some explanation. What makes you think that such a premise leads to such a conclusion? "... does that mean none of them are correct?" seems to be a question along a similar train of thought, but the reverse. What question are you asking here? – stoicfury Feb 15 '15 at 18:14
1

You seem to assume that if something is true, everybody would believe it. However, in ancient times, people believed the earth was flat. Now, we believe that the earth is round (like a pancake). Clearly at least one of these two ideas must be wrong. This is in contradiction with your premise that if everything is true, everybody would believe it.

  • I mean current day. – Tim Feb 14 '15 at 18:18
  • @Tim so, only at this moment you assume that if something is true, everybody would believe it? Why not in ancient times? What's the difference? Before, even the greatest minds of the world thought the earth was flat. It's rather arrogant to say there's not even the slightest possibility that the great minds of today aren't wrong on some small details, no? – Keelan Feb 14 '15 at 18:31
  • No, what I'm saying is, with all the current knowledge, why isn't religion agreed upon? – Tim Feb 14 '15 at 18:32
  • @Tim isn't it obvious? There's an element of faith. – Keelan Feb 14 '15 at 19:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.