4

Reading Whitmans epic - The Leaves of Grass recently; I was so struck by his language and it's similarity to Nietzsches that I suspected that he had been influenced or read him.

For example:

I celebrate myself, and sing myself

And what I assume you shall assume

Which sounds like a possible conception of the Uberman; and

Do I contradict myself

Very well then, I contradict myself

I am large, I contain multitudes

Which as an idea appears in Nietzsche.

Further, consider that both positioned themselves as bards and prophets.

But this appears to be not the case; but it does appears that both were influenced by the Transcendentalism of Emerson: the over-soul and his 'foolish consistency'.

But why is one taken to be a philosopher and the other a poet; when it appears that both were philosopher-poets?

5
  • Focus. Poetry, like music, is a drug (insofar as drug means mind altering in terms of emotion). What are the authors/producers focused on - truth or evoking emotion? Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 1:21
  • 2
    I think it's more to do with the fact that Nietzsche was involved in the academic humanities (he had a PhD in philology). Nietzsche's non-poetic works are read just as much as Zarathustra, whereas Whitman's non-poetic works are rarely studied.
    – J. LS
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 7:30
  • @RonRoyston but can Nietzsche be said to be focused on truth? The writings of his that I read weren't logical arguments, but bombastic, emotional assertions. Maybe the argument is there and I missed it, or maybe I just read bad Nietzsche. Whatever the case, I don't see how he's any more philosophical than Emerson.
    – R. Barzell
    Commented May 8, 2015 at 19:18
  • @royston: to compare poetry to a drug is already a kind of metaphor; and aren't you presenting an argument? Commented May 8, 2015 at 21:10
  • @MoziburUllah True. I am thinking that poetry (and music) evokes emotion whereas philosophy is sobering. Commented May 9, 2015 at 1:30

1 Answer 1

2

I would agree both are philosopher-poets, though I would add many other qualities. However, I am inclined to point out from a purely academic perspective,if a case had to be made as to why they're dropped into either a "philosopher" group or a "poet" group, the focus of each sets them up to be lumped into those groups.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .