5

This question already has an answer here:

I have just finished my second year of a pure mathematics degree and am intrigued by philosophy, and would like to spend my summer learning more about philosophy to accompany my mathematical interest.

I have no prior knowledge or study of philosophy, so I am very much looking for resources for beginners.

marked as duplicate by DBK, Keelan, Joseph Weissman Jun 1 '15 at 19:27

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • What exactly are you interested in? As a student of mathematics you'll be familiar with formal logic so I'd recommend a book on metaphysics (there are quite a few relevant ebooks on Amazon) to get you started. – Atamiri Jun 1 '15 at 10:35
  • 1
    welcome to Phil.SE; philosophy is a house of many mansions; it might be useful to browse a resource like the IEP or read a book such as Sophies World to identify which mansion interests you; however one doesn't need either to say what area interests you in a vague hand-waves way: ie are there specific philosophers that interest you ie Wittgenstein or Locke; or specific areas like the theory of knowledge or logic or indeed physical phenomena? – Mozibur Ullah Jun 1 '15 at 10:42
  • Or ethics and politics? – Mozibur Ullah Jun 1 '15 at 13:52
  • Whatever you do, stay away from Heidegger. – Alexander S King Jun 1 '15 at 16:44
3

The question of where to start in philosophy is controversial, and has many different answers already on this site. However, in specifically bridging between mathematics and philosophy, I'd recommend a combination of Plato --specifically the Meno --and advanced symbolic logic.

Plato extensively uses mathematics as a metaphor for his philosophical concepts and was in turn an influence on the development of mathematics. Advanced symbolic logic was born out of an attempt (most famously by Russell and Whitehead) to unite mathematics and philosophy, and has strong implications for both fields.

You might also enjoy the work of Descartes, a towering giant in both mathematics and philosophy. Pascal is likewise noted in both fields.

3

Since you have an interest in philosophy and ability in mathematics, I would suggest picking up some logic, set theory, etc. (as suggested elsewhere) -- and you might consider looking into the philosophy of language and other allied areas, typically classed as "formal philosophy", where the "formal" indicates occasional, if not constant recourse to mathematics or formal methods in the context of philosophical research. Because you have an inclination towards mathematics it makes sense for you to lean towards formal subjects. (One interesting catch-all source is More Precisely:The Math you Need to do Philosophy by Steinhart. This would help you see what non-logical, formal methods are of relevance to philosophy in a digestible way. You could read it in the summer. Actually it's a really straightforward, and I would say easy book, especially for someone with training in maths.)

Yet, no one comes to philosophy without an interest in something. There has to be a draw. And this draw might not be formal. (This very same thing has happened before, say, in Gian Carlo Rota, a great mathematician yet one who had no interest in analytic philosophy; a strange, yet similar story can be told about Kurt Godel, who did not understand analytic philosophy.)

For instance, you may have read some Sartre in high school and that really appealed to you. So I would encourage you to be specific about what is drawing you to philosophy, and follow that up (if you can discern what that is -- if you have any specific sources, those of us on the stack can help you discern what you appear to be interested in). It's a little more organic that way. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is really good for this. It can help you both with formal and non-formal philosophy, it's really a great resource. And the bibliographies of those articles are well-compiled and provide you an idea for where you might wish to go next.

But I will still encourage you to look at formal philosophy, because I think it may appeal to you. The trouble, of course, is that if you're reading Sartre on the one hand and Principia Mathematica on the other you might wonder what the common ground is. But if you do philosophy at all you're gonna have to wrestle with that someday anyway and that common ground is for you to find.

2

Learning about philosophy in the context of the field's historical development and as it relates to math can be a fun approach. To this end, Gödel, Escher, Bach and Logicomix have been fun, stimulating reads. If you're looking for something more comprehensive, consider Bertrand Russell's A History of Western Philosophy (can't post a third link as a new user...).

  • When reading Logicomix one should keep in mind that it is not historically accurate. – Keelan Jun 1 '15 at 18:15
  • You'd be hard pressed not to keep that in mind as it is brought up multiple times between the narrative and the appendix. – esmail Nov 16 '15 at 21:25
-2

I began learning philosophy without knowing it to be philosophy. This is one of the way you can follow.

To learn, there is infinity. Try to know the significant path of knowledge suitable to your aim of life. If you need philosophy, you will meet philosophy on your path. Then, there is no question of "how to begin", your path will help you to begin anything you need. All the best.

  • 3
    This might be true but it's not particularly helpful. – Chris Sunami Jun 1 '15 at 14:51
  • You might want to clarify how OP can discover whether what he is learning is philosophy. That way, your answer can be transformed to a helpful one. – Cicero Jun 1 '15 at 16:51

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.