2

In section 2 of Being and Time, Heidegger discusses "what belongs to a question in general". In particular, he writes (transl. by Joan Stambaugh)

Every questioning is a seeking. Every seeking takes its direction beforehand from what is sought. Questioning is a knowing search for beings in their thatness and whatness. The knowing search can become an "investigation," as the revealing determination of what the question aims at. As questioning about ... questioning has what it asks about [Befragtes]. All asking about ... is in some way an inquiring of ... . Besides what is asked, what is interrogated [Gefragtes] also belongs to questioning. What is questioned is to be defined and conceptualized in the investigating, that is, the specifically theoretical, question. As what is really intended, what is to be ascertained [Erfragtes] lies in what is questioned; here questioning arrives at its goal.

I think this is a great passage. I am also wondering: is this threefold structuring of the act of questioning an original idea by Heidegger, or is he taking his cue from some earlier thinker(s), for example from medieval philosophy? (Somehow, to me, the threefold partition has a medieval ring about it.)

Edit: in his book Making Sense of Heidegger, Thomas Sheehan discusses the threefold structure quite extensively (starting on p. 13), calling it "the three moments of any question". He claims that the Befragtes is "what medieval Scholasticism called the obiectum materiale quod or material object". Other than that, though, he does not give any indication that any writers before Heidegger have adopted the same threefold subdivision.

  • 2
    The model of investigation is vaguely reminiscent of Aristotle's model of inquiry insofar as the mode of inquiry is determined by the nature of the object and the purpose of the inquiry (but it's pretty hard to come up with a different model really). There's also a teleological notion mentioned in the second sentence insofar as seeking is pre-determined by the sought... But I'm just speculating on that point. – virmaior Jun 16 '15 at 0:57
  • 2
    The mention of thatness and whatness is a reference to existence and essence, the scholastic concepts derived from Aristotle. – Jonathan Basile Jun 16 '15 at 15:41
  • Thank you both! @virmaior: would you happen to have a more precise reference to Aristotle's works? I would be grateful for the opportunity to see for myself how vague the similarity is! – RP_ Jul 2 '15 at 20:02
  • 1
    He mentions this method at Nicomachean Ethics bk 1 part 1. It's also roughly speaking the topic here: gradworks.umi.com/33/83/3383256.html (dissertation on Aristotle). The key phrase you are looking for is "endoxic method." – virmaior Jul 2 '15 at 22:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.