Stack Exchange Network
Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including
Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Anybody can ask a question
The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
10 years, 11 months ago
Nozick agrees that the Gettier counterexamples to the JTB analysis of knowledge are cases where someone has a JTB but does not know. What is his explanation of what has gone wrong in those cases? Specifically what conditions in Nozick’s account of knowledge are not satisfied?
415 1 1 gold badge 3 3 silver badges 19 19 bronze badges
Apr 1, 2012 at 19:59
Kevin Davis Kevin Davis
449 1 1 gold badge 4 4 silver badges 13 13 bronze badges
Yes I believe it is his counterfactual statements.
true belief that p is knowledge if and only if the following two conditions hold:
if p were not the case, one would not believe that p,
and if p were the case, one would believe that p.
I've only just started to research it myself, but this might help:
Apr 12, 2012 at 13:58
Ben Jackson Ben Jackson
339 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges
log in to answer this question.
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our
Accept all cookies
Necessary cookies only