Nozick agrees that the Gettier counterexamples to the JTB analysis of knowledge are cases where someone has a JTB but does not know. What is his explanation of what has gone wrong in those cases? Specifically what conditions in Nozick’s account of knowledge are not satisfied?

  • Is it his counterfactual statements? – Kevin Davis Apr 1 '12 at 20:03
  • What does JTB mean? – Ron Maimon Apr 1 '12 at 22:51
  • 3
    JTB = "Justifed True Belief" – Rex Kerr Apr 2 '12 at 1:27

Yes I believe it is his counterfactual statements.

One’s true belief that p is knowledge if and only if the following two conditions hold:

  • if p were not the case, one would not believe that p,
  • and if p were the case, one would believe that p.

I've only just started to research it myself, but this might help: http://www.iep.utm.edu/epis-clo/#SH3b

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.