Arendt, in her book The Human Condition identified the 'rise of the social' as part of the movement of modernity; this is an expansion of the private sphere of the household (oikos) into the public sphere (polis); the public sphere where action is actually possible (by this Arendt means political action - her archetype is the Greek polis and the citizen who acts in the public sphere; and it is by his actions there that he is noted as a citizen).

The social is also named by mass - mass-media, mass-education etc.

Q. Can we say that social media is it's latest manifestation? For virtually, we appear to live in a many-mansioned house.

Q. Supposing there is such a thing as feminine morality or ethic (not neccessarily tied to females); and tied to the oikos (home, household); does this help explain its rise, given the expansion of the oikos at the expense of the polis; and recalling that the word oikos lies at the root of the words ecology and economy.

closed as too broad by Joseph Weissman Jan 16 '16 at 17:23

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.