I do not feel prepared to read primary sources yet.
What should I read, after reading these short introductions?
Are there exhaustive introductory textbooks?
If not, then is the next step to branch into reading textbooks from each major branch of philosophy? If so, which should I read?

closed as too broad by Keelan, James Kingsbery, Alexander S King, Philip Klöcking, Joseph Weissman Jan 15 '16 at 20:08

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    Consider the possibility that you have had already an excessive amount of exposure to introductory material, before tackling the classics, directly. Consider also the possibility that philosophy is as much an adventure as it is a systematic discipline. – André Souza Lemos Nov 13 '15 at 16:22
  • 1
    Hi. You may want to try Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy. – Ram Tobolski Nov 16 '15 at 0:04
  • You may try the Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy series. – user 170039 Jan 13 '16 at 15:58
  • At least when I was an undergrad, the intro level philosophy classes were divided into "Morals and Ethics" and "Epistemology and Metaphysics." One book that covers all of this would be overly broad, so I think this question should be narrowed. – James Kingsbery Jan 13 '16 at 20:57
  • 1
    I don't think this question should be closed. It's a good question that lots of people might have. – shane Jan 13 '16 at 21:50

John Hospers's Introduction to Philosophical Analysis is an older text, but one of the few genuinely systematic textbooks at the introductory level in contemporary philosophy.

If you are looking for a more historically-oriented introduction to the subject for self-study, then I think Fieser and Stumpf is what you're looking for. Although let me also mention the excellent one volume anthology put out by Kaufmann and Baird called Philosophical Classics: From Plato to Derrida. I am not recommending Kaufmann and Baird only because for self-study I think the student will require a bit more guidance than K&B give, since their anthology is aimed at students who will have a professor in class to explain the material.

  • I'm going here with @ChrisSunami. An anthology is almost always way better that an interpretative book if read for itself. The best way would be using original texts as basis (reading a text at least 4-5 times before thinking to have understood it) and after that one more time parallel to a systematic/interpretative book explaining it. Philosophy in the end is getting an intuition for yourself, not following standard interpretations that tend to be dogmatic. – Philip Klöcking Jan 13 '16 at 22:10

At this point I would suggest a general anthology of philosophy. There are many of these, and most of them have similar selections of work. The advantage here is that you're reading primary sources, not interpretations (although there are usually introductory essays to go along with them), and you're reading a large cross section of best-known work of the most influential thinkers.

This one (linked) looks to be the latest edition of the one used when I took Philosophy 101 many years ago. If not, it still seems like an excellent overview of at least the classic Western Philosophical canon. You'd need to supplement it if you wanted non-Western philosophy and/or more recent thinkers.

  • @LePressentiment See edit above – Chris Sunami Feb 8 '16 at 16:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.