Wittgenstein and Russell both moved away from Logical Atomism, and it is generally considered to have failed as a theory of how language connects to truth.
However, as an IT person, when I first came into contact with Logical Atomism, its ideas were so obvious and intuitive as to be almost be trivial. I can see the ideas of Logical Atomism embodied in the way programming languages are structured, in the way specification and requirement documentation is written, and in the way legal documents are written. The format of the Tractatus may have seemed weird at the time, but now it is familiar to anyone who has to deal with business documents and complicated installation and user manuals.
- Is it legitimate to say that Logical Atomism has indeed had permanent effect on the way we use language in certain domains?
- Or are the similarities I have mentioned above coincidental, and are just du to the generally analytical nature of the domains I mentioned?
- Has anyone argued for the above point: that Logical Atomism has had a long term effect on our culture?