In relation to my earlier question,
Apart from Fact being a component of reality, what other factors comprise of reality which are sufficient for anything to be Fact?
And by saying Truth: a possible property of Propositions. Where a proposition can be anything and everything. Basically a question out of curiosity, and a satisfactory explanation to the same question, where language is crucial to know or to search for the very same Truth.
In this context, Truth exists only to the truth bearer, PP is true to A' @ QE and the same PP need not be true to a' @ EQ . Where PP is being true and untrue at the same-time. Can anyone please explain this dualistic tendency of truth.
For example: According to science, Colour is not an inherent property of an object, but we perceive as, it is.
Factness rely upon the reality, and reality upon truth. Where truth is conditional.
Pardon me for disappointing you, I am trying to understand the blurred line between true - false and certain - uncertain. For example; from the question "According to science, Colour is not an inherent property of an object, but we perceive Colour as an inherent property of an object." For instance; Blue Bag, Pink Rose, Black Car. Here if we omit colour then the objects looses its certain unique identity. we are certainly attributing colour as an object's property, even though our knowledge that which is acquired and which is accepted by substantial number of people is quite opposite. Is our perception preventing us to accept the change caused by knowledge, which influences and alter our beliefs greatly. On the other hand if knowledge does influence belief then our language must have changed greatly since this awareness will influence the way we communicate.