They seem very similar to me, but I judge that they were given two distinct Wikipedia pages for a reason. Is the difference that a "first principle" is a predicated statement while a "primitive notion" can only serve as the subject of such a statement? The Wikipedia page for primitive notion states that a primitive notion "...is analogous to an axiom", so hence can be predicated, but the content of the rest of the page seems to contradict this. Perhaps "primitive notion" is a more general type than "first principle"?

1 Answer 1


Primitive notions are undefined concepts within a theory. For example, a theory of meaning may have causation as a primitive notion. A theory of causation, obviously, will not.

First principles are propositions that are not argued for in a theory -- maybe because they are considered self-evident. For example that we know our Ideas and Impressions, in Hume's philosophy; that (Descartes) thinks, in Descartes's philosophy.

So, a primitive notion is expressed by a noun phrase: "causation", "the good". First principles are expressed by sentences: "I think", "We know our Ideas and Impressions".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.