0

Source: p 498, A Concise Introduction to Logic (12 Ed, 2014) by Patrick Hurley

Any heavyweight can defeat any lightweight.
[1.] (x) [ Hx ⊃ (y) ( Ly ⊃ Dxy ) ]

Even after reading this, Nested Conditionals still confuse me.
I bolded the only 2 changes. Why is it wrong to translate 1 as 3 below?
I pursue only intuition; please do not answer with formal proofs or Truth Tables.

  1. (x) [ (y) ( Hx ⊃ Ly ) ⊃ Dxy ]
  • Why would you translate it in that way? – user2953 Jan 5 '16 at 22:36
  • @Keelan My problem is that I am confused (and do not know) which way is correct, for Nested Conditionals. – NNOX Apps Jan 5 '16 at 22:38
  • 2
    Now it is wrong; as already discussed at lenght : A ⊃ (B ⊃ C) and (A ⊃ B) ⊃ C are not equivalent: see truth table. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jan 5 '16 at 22:38
  • @MauroALLEGRANZA Thanks. Yes, I remember, but as I wrote above, I still am entirely confused how to select which. – NNOX Apps Jan 5 '16 at 22:39
  • A good rule of thumb would be: if the sentence isn't grammatically awkward, use A ⊃ (B ⊃ C). Here, the sentence ("if x is heavyweight then if y is lightweight then x can defeat y") isn't too awkward. The other way around would be "if it is true that if x is heavyweight then y is lightweight, then x can defeat y" which is much more awkward. – user2953 Jan 5 '16 at 22:43
1

We can use a step-by-step approach.

We have already learned that : "Every human is mortal" is formalized as :

(x) ( Hx ⊃ Mx ).

Now conisder [1.] : "Any heavyweight can defeat any lightweight" and firstly "approximate" it as : "Any heavyweight is a defeater".

This statement has the same logical form of the previous example, i.e.:

(x) ( Hx ⊃ Defx ).

Now consider : "x is a defeater of any lightweight". We can rewrite it as "Any lightweight is a defeated by x",i.e.:

(y) ( Ly ⊃ Dxy ).

Now you have only to replace "x is a defeater" [i.e. Defx] with "x is a defeater of any lightweight" [i.e. (y) ( Ly ⊃ Dxy )] to get :

(x) ( Hx ⊃ (y) ( Ly ⊃ Dxy ) ).

| improve this answer | |
0

What makes your version wrong has nothing to do with the quantifiers. As Mauro pointed out, the general form (A ⊃ B) ⊃ C is NOT equivalent to A ⊃ (B ⊃ C). What you want is (A & B) ⊃ C.

With that in mind, you could write this

(x) [ (y) ( Hx & Ly ) ⊃ Dxy ]

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.