0

I am a total novice to philosophy trying to make sense of a computer science article which makes reference to possible world theory. I don't really understand the formalization in the last sentence below (see attached image for proper formatting). This is because I don't understand the word "arity" or the relation suggested by the superscript. It's be great if someone could lend some insight.

Let S be an arbitrary system, D an arbitrary set of distinguished elements of S, and W the set of world states for S (also called worlds, or possible worlds). The tuple is called a domain space for S, as it intuitively fixes the space of variability of the universe of discourse D with respect to the possible states of S. An intensional relation ρ^n of arity n on n is a total function ρ^n : W → 2^D^n from the set W into the set of all n-ary (extensional) relations on D.

excerpt from Handbook on Ontologies

2

The arity of a relation R is the number of its "argument places".

Thus, the relation "less than" is a binary relation: it has arity 2. We usually write: x < y, but we can write it "more formally" as: <(x,y).

An extensional relation of arity n on D is a subset of D^n (i.e. D x D x ... x D: the set of all n-uples).

The set of all extensional relations of arity n is 2^D^n (i.e. the power set of D^n).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.