0

Is Francois Lyotard the founder of postmodernism and the person who coined this term?

Wikipedia writes:

Lyotard later admitted that he had a 'less than limited' knowledge of the science he was to write about, and to compensate for this knowledge, he 'made stories up' and referred to a number of books that he hadn't actually read. In retrospect, he called it 'a parody' and 'simply the worst of all my books'.

My question is, why did Lyotard set out to write a book about stuff he knew nothing about? So postmodernism is all about people enjoying parodies (sort of like being associated with a certain type of humor)?

  • The government paid him to. Corruption rules. – jobermark May 31 '16 at 22:16
  • Funny but unrealistic. Why would a government want that? Maybe some kind of grant and he didn't know what to do with it? – Jack Maddington May 31 '16 at 22:19
  • 2
    I am only half joking: From the same Wikipedia article you quote "Short but influential, the book was originally written as a report on the influence of technology in exact sciences, commissioned by the Conseil des universités du Québec." So some bizarre process selected an literary critical theorist to review the future direction of science in the province. Most likely corruption. – jobermark Jun 1 '16 at 15:29
  • Funny. Someone who doesn't understand technology commissioned to predict its effect on science. :-D – Jack Maddington Jun 1 '16 at 18:00
1

You raise a diverse range of questions, which I'll try to address in some form.

Lyotard is not really the "founder" of postmodernism, though his book is sometimes understood as something of a manifesto of postmodernism. Lyotard presents "postmodernism" as a name for something already in progress, a name which summarises what philosophers have been up to in developed industrial societies. The term "postmodernism" itself was used prior to Lyotard's book. It was possibly coined the American poet Charles Olson. Whether what Olson meant by postmodernism is the same as what Lyotard meant is debatable. Perry Anderson, in his The Origins of Postmodernity (from which that Wikipedia quote is drawn), claims that Lyotard got the word from Ihab Hassan. In any case, it had been used in art criticism and architecture prior to Lyotard. Hence, Gary Aylesworth's assertion that "postmodernism" "first entered the philosophical lexicon" through Lyotard's book is probably the most accurate way of phrasing things. Lyotard uses the word "postmodernism" to characterise a range of philosophical views that share certain concerns.

When, in the interview Wikipedia cites, Lyotard says that he had a "less than limited" knowledge it should be read, in part, as something of a joke, similar to what he explains in the introduction to the original report:

the author [of this report] is not exactly an expert; he is a philosopher. An expert knows what he knows and what he does not know, because an expert knows what knowledge is in his game. By doing me the honour of addressing his order to the philosopher that I am, the President of the Council of Universities with the Government of Quebec obviously knows that I do not know what knowledge is in the most developed industrial societies [(this being the subject the report was devoted to)]. He simply asked that I question it....

Les problèmes du savoir dans les sociétés industrielles les plus développées, p.2. (My translation)

Lyotard here is having a bit of fun (indeed, he is explaining, in the introduction, why the report is a failure): he has been asked to produce this report but "obviously" it is on a topic he is not an expert in. Nor is such an expert what is required; after all, an expert already knows what knowledge is but can only tell you what he already knows, because an expert's notion of knowledge is only knowledge within a certain language-game (Lyotard makes fairly heavy use of Wittgensteinian "language-games"). Instead, the report is written by a philosopher because what is required is not expertise, but a willingness to question which is foreclosed to the expert who already knows what knowledge is and thus has no need to ask.

At one level, this is just fun and games (and Lyotard's language in the passage cited above is quite over-the-top), but it also establishes a serious point: there isn't just one mode of knowing, but several; there isn't just one way of responding to the demand that prompts Lyotard's report, but several. In some ways, this has been well-known. Traditionally, from Plato and perhaps before, philosophers have argued that philosophy is different from expertise, and that what philosophy aims at ("wisdom") is superior to expertise. While making something like this first move (philosophy is something other than expertise) Lyotard doesn't try to make this second move; there are different forms of knowing (expertise, philosophy, etc.) and the point is to attend to these differences. Expertise is not required because "knowledge" is no longer understood as a single thing; rather, there are a range and variety of "knowledges" depending on the language-game one is engaged in. It's this distinction between "knowledges" and the transformation that it produces in our notion of "knowledge" that is the subject of Lyotard's report, not "the influence of technology on the exact sciences" as Wikipedia claims. (Despite the citations, neither of Wikipedia's sources reinforce this claim; Bruneault claims that Lyotard's report was written on the legitimisation of scientific knowledge and Perry speaks of it as dealing with "the epistemological fate of the natural sciences," p. 26).

Despite the occasional humorous tones, postmodernism isn't just jokes or parodies. Where they are used, they are in the service of more serious points, but with the conviction that how a point is argued can be as important as what is argued per se. This is often seen (as with Lyotard) as an implication of a consistent application of speech-act theory: arguments aren't just formal propositions; they should enact what they theorise.

1

According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ..."The term “postmodernism” first entered the philosophical lexicon in 1979, with the publication of The Postmodern Condition by Jean-François Lyotard."

There are many people who are associated with this "school of thought" so it is hard for me to single out one person who could be considered the "founder".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.