3

I'm reading the book A Concise Introduction to Logic (12th edition), and they say that this is a deduction:

Gabriel is a wolf.
Gabriel has a tail.
Therefore, Gabriel’s tail is the tail of a wolf.

Is that correct? It is not only probable that Gabriel's tail is a wolf's tail? He may can have a cat's tail because of a transplant. This conclusion necessarily follows?

Improve this question
2
  • 1
    Yes, that is a classic deduction. It only relies on premises (definitions) and logic, not observations or any other extranea. By definition, the tail on a wolf is the tail of a wolf; the wolf possesses that tail; it is the wolf's tail, regardless of how he came by it.
    – Dan Bron
    Jun 1, 2016 at 13:33
  • With "a wolf tail" it'd be induction.
    – Quentin Ruyant
    Jun 1, 2016 at 14:40

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
13

Even if it was (by transplant) "a cat's tail" (phenomenological), it would still be Gabriel's tail (i.e. the tail of Gabriel, possessive/as a predicate), and since Gabriel is a wolf, it would be the tail of a wolf, namely of Gabriel the wolf (possessive/as a predicate).

Therefore, it is a clean deduction, though perhaps a bit clumsy in the formulation.

Addition including the comment of @quen_tin: The reason why the formulation is clumsy is that the fine differences between "tail of a wolf" and "wolf tail" make the difference between deduction and induction or possibly (as this is a single occurence) even more precise: Abduction.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    +1 for mentioning abduction. Indeed, deducting that Gabriel's tail is that of a wolf is a deduction, but saying that all wolf as the same tail as Gabriel (a wolf tail) is clearly an abduction since you are generalizing from one example.
    – gaborous
    Jun 1, 2016 at 20:00
3

It is a deduction, namely it's a deductive argument, put it in the standard form, although it isn't clear if it's valid and sound or not(to me it is) that doesn't mean that is not a deduction. Previous answers are trying to prove the validity and soundness of this deductive argument, but your question is, if it's a deduction, which it is.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.