Specifically for the material implication if possible. Who was the first to use a truth table for this and justify its validity?

  • really, all a truth table is, is a definition. Jun 10 '16 at 0:52
  • 3
    @robertbristow-johnson But it had to originate from somewhere, and have a justification behind it. Jun 10 '16 at 2:19
  • the question of origin can be applied to anything. definitions don't require justification. they're axioms. Jun 10 '16 at 4:44
  • 3
    @robertbristow-johnson The question of origin can be applied to anything, I don't see that as a problem. As for justification, there must be a reason for the definition. That is what I am looking for. Jun 10 '16 at 14:44
  • 1
    @robertbristow-johnson In mathematics, definitions and axioms are not the same. Axioms are the foundation for a theory, while definitions are merelyhandy abbreviations.
    – jjack
    Jan 6 '18 at 9:07

You can see:

as well as:

Before Bertrand Russell (Harvard logic course: 1914) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (Russell and Wittgenstein's manuscript dated 1912; see also: Tractatus (1921), 4.31 and 4.442 for material implication), Charles Sanders Peirce and his followers must be credited.

See Christine Ladd-Franklin, “On the Algebra of Logic”, in Charles Sanders Peirce (editor), Studies in Logic (1883), page 17-on; see pages 61-62.

In Whitehead and Russell's Principia (page 115), we have a description of the truth-functional semantics of connective : not, if..., then..., and, or (but not in tabular form).

The modern tabular form is present in E.Post, Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions (1921), §2 Truth table development, with explicit reference to W&R's Principia (see footnote 6).

The verbal" description of conditional is in Frege's Begriffsschrift.

But it was already verbally stated in Ancient Stoic Logic with the so-called philonian conditional; see Sextus Empiricus, Πρὸς μαθηματικούς (Pros mathematikous) Book VIII, 113:

Philo, for example, said that the conditional is true when it does not begin with a true proposition and finish with a false one, so that a conditional, according to him, is true in three ways and false in one way. For when it begins with a true one and finishes with a true one, it is true, as in “If it is day, it is light.” And when it begins with a false one and finishes with a false one, it is again true – for example, “If the earth flies, the earth has wings.”


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.