From what I've collected, Quine seemed to have solved the problem of non-being by using Russell's theory of definite descriptions through the negation of the x having certain properties/descriptions. However, I hear Kripke rejected Russell's definite descriptions. How did Kripke solve the problem of non-being with his theory of reference?

  • 1
    I'll try to get around to providing an actual answer, but you might wanna check out Kripke's Reference and Existence. In particular, look at his treatment of names in fictional discourse. – Dennis Jun 19 '16 at 17:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.