I am thoroughly analyzing Plato's Symposium.I would like advice on how to compose an essay/paper on what I have read. I have written notes from many times I have gone and reread the dialogues. I have my own thoughts and opinions when it comes to each of the characters in the dialogues but what should my paper be about? I have seen essays focusing on a single character, so should I write several essays on each character? I do not want to just regurgitate what I read, nor rephrase the viewpoints of the characters, I want to provide an original analysis but I am having a difficult time deciding what is the best route to take.It is not for any academic purpose.
There are basically two ways to go with this, you can either attempt to show a single overriding theme or through-line argument progressing through all of The Symposium, or you can choose a single one of its stories and unpack its meaning and implications.
On the face of it, you can either focus on explaining what Plato's intentions were, or you can use the discussion as a way to advance your own original argument. Any time you explain another philosopher's work, however, you inevitably introduce your own perspective, and any time you want to explain your own perspective, it's helpful to begin by extending another philosopher's work, so those two approaches really aren't that different.
The one thing I wouldn't do is a series of unconnected essays --you'll want to develop a single theme, argument or perspective if you want your final product to have any impact. Best of luck, I applaud you making these efforts independent of any academic requirement.