I keep seeing people talking about the increased importance of curation in art today.
What is going on here, has any philosopher discussed this trend or possible problems linked to curation of art? Especially in relation to the internet.
Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
There are several interesting documentaries that deal with this topic of art appreciation vs art curation. "My Kid Could Paint That" directed by Amir Bar-Lev and "Who the *$&% Is Jackson Pollock?" directed by Harry Moses both deal with the incongruence of art value as an intrinsic quality of art versus a value determined by the curator and "high art community". This is not a new trend, as its much the same in classical art patron who supports and commissions art. I think the difference is a change in society. We are less divided in a socially enforced aristocracy. Instead we are increasingly using economics to define this division. Thus, we have professionalized this divid using curators.
Additionally, the availability of social media and internet access has made it so that art can be disseminated by and to the mass public. As a somewhat opposing force, there are communities that employ credentialism in order to create a qualitative differentiation, and this relies on the institutionalization of curating.