Does the following argument involve a fallacy?

My garden will be healthy if I water the plants assiduously. Thus my garden will certainly be healthy, as I will indeed water the plants assiduously.

(a) undistributed middle

(b) denying the antecedent

(c) affirming the consequent

(d) no fallacy: deductively valid

  • Is it deductively valid?
    – Nicola
    Sep 5 '16 at 3:17
  • 1
    You neither accept nor comment any of the answers/comments to your previous posts; why do you go on submitting new questions ? Sep 5 '16 at 6:17
  • I am sorry, I am uncertain of what I have to do? Please elaborate on how to do so ?
    – Nicola
    Sep 5 '16 at 10:17
  • 1
    This certainly looks like asking us to do your homework. In that case: What are your thoughts? Not just "is the answer (d)" but "I think the answer is (d) because...".
    – gnasher729
    Sep 5 '16 at 14:53

The argument is deductively valid (though it rests on an assumption about the future).

You can reformulate it as a basic modus ponens as follows:

  1. If I water the plants assiduously, my garden will be healthy
  2. I will water the plants assiduously

Therefore, 3. My garden will be healthy

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.