Completely out of curiosity, how would someone like Nietzsche, let's use him as an example, argue against Aquinas's metaphysical argument for classical theism. I can't seem to find any references in his works, so I thought it would be an interesting thought experiment to think about how Nietzsche would argue against someone like Thomas Aquinas. I'm excited to see your answers.

  • 1
    Why questions with a bounty can be opinion based and not confirm with the guidelines of the SE? – John Am Feb 17 '17 at 18:47
  • 1
    It promotes the idea that someone who pays more is above the rules? – John Am Feb 17 '17 at 18:50
  • Folks seem to be upvoting the question, so it can't be as bad as it seems. But I agree, defensively putting a bounty on a question you know is weak to protect it from closure is inappropriate. – user9166 Feb 20 '17 at 22:38
  • Nietzsche's argument against classical theism is "Look around. How much damage has been done by this concept, versus how much good? It was a beautiful idea -- several of them even. We get the point, but it didn't work." What more needs to be said? – user9166 Feb 20 '17 at 22:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.