Peirce, James, & Dewey are generally regarded as the three originators of American pragmatism. Personally, I have noticed each of them for different reasons. James is interesting because of his radical empiricism, Dewey because of his understanding of inquiry as both cognitive and action-oriented, and Peirce because of his work on abduction.

However, I don't have a clear overview of how each of their philosophies compare overall. Hence, my question is: what are the main differences between the philosophies of Peirce, James, & Dewey?

  • 3
    I think your asking for a doctoral thesis ;)
    – Lucas
    Mar 9, 2014 at 18:36
  • A more modest question you might consider: How do each of these philosophers define Pragmatism (or see its role)? That definition alone will give you a good start, as all three define it differently. @Lucas is right, you're asking for a thesis, if not a series of books.
    – jxn
    Apr 29, 2014 at 16:54

1 Answer 1


James and Dewey were students of Peirce. Peirce opposed their pragmatism to such a degree that he thought it necessary to term his original pragmatism "pragmaticism," distinguishing it from their simple positivist pragmatism, which is compatible with nominalism, as superior to it in three ways:

…first, its retention of a purified philosophy; secondly, its full acceptance of the main body of our instinctive beliefs; and thirdly, its strenuous insistence upon the truth of scholastic realism (or a close approximation to that…

—C. S. Peirce, Collected Papers vol. 5 (Pragmatism & Pragmaticism) 5.423

See the section "Pragmaticism is not Pragmatism" on PDF pages 15 ff. of "The Red Book" (Deely's Four Ages of Understanding ch. 15).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .