Why is Heidegger making a difference between 'zeug' (instruments) and a work of art?

The reason that I do not understand this difference is that in my experience every object has the power to show possibilities of being, in that showing me a world and conceiving other possibilities to.


Equipment (zeug) shows a world to the person using the equipment. A work of art gathers people into a shared world; as a temple, or in a museum. Shoes might be equipment to a peasant, but a painting of peasant's boots can show the world of the peasant to every viewer.

I'm paraphrasing from "The Origin of the Work of Art".

  • Thank you for your answer. I understand from your answer that 'zeug' is private and art can gather this for more people. – Jan Cornelis Jan 20 '17 at 10:29
  • I did not get that from the text. Still my question remains why Heidegger gives this unique quality to art. Lets say we are together in a field and see a farmer working. His using of zeug shows us his world and in this gathers us in this world. – Jan Cornelis Jan 20 '17 at 10:33
  • 1
    Heidegger is distinguishing between three categories of things: mere objects, instruments (things that are useful), and works, which gather people and reveal an understanding of being. A farmer could write a song or draw picture of their plow. The song or picture, when others view it, could be a work of art, if it reveals the world of the farmer. – Enowning Jan 23 '17 at 3:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.