I managed to create cold fission by placing a carbon crucible into a polysyrene cut out, put a few small sticks of glow stick stuff from the dollar store, put the lid on and generated a 5 meter field with both negative and positive polarities and videoed it and sent it to multiple people. Light also effected this contraption. I also have managed to reduce the mass or increase the mass of this contraption and measure it using wood planks. Please review the following experimentation results and denial of truth. There have been several attempts to try and silence me on this subject and I have no idea why: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/306649/has-anyone-tried-to-simulate-an-atomic-structure-using-electromagnets-and-curren
Would you rather stay on earth than travel faster than the speed of light and reach sirius in a matter of no time?
I believe that our current view of the universe is inconsistent with the scientific method due to the fact that evidence is being directly ignored with two seperate fundamentle principals being created to explain the clearly presented conclusive evidence, and that there must be previous misconceptions in the scientific models when some of the deductions were made to cause this phenomena. Causing some of the evidence produced in the modern age to being falsified due to inaccuracies with calculations based on characteristics of interactions within specific scenarios rather than any physical evidence. Assumptions could include the fact that we thought an atom was the smallest particle until subatomic particles were found, and we thought those were the smallest possible particle until quarks were found and their constituants were theorized.
Perhaps stating that the conclusion that has been arrived at is one of various different possibilities when something has not been proven conclusively and quantifying that fact using a value?
I reference the following theory as proof on this in a way to help theorize on how to improve the accuracies of the scientific method.