The life of Jesus is largely the same as that of Socrates. I'm looking at the possibility that Jesus was affected by Socrates' life to such an extent that he tried to copy him. Are there any information that would exclude such a possibility?

There is no question of whether Socrates was a real person, but whether his literary work was his own or Plato's work. Xenophon, a student of Socrates, had also spoken of Socrates' life and work. Diogenis Laertios, who lived several years later, speaks enough about Socrates. An ancient tragic poet also mentions Socrates in his work. Plato, described Diogenes Kinikos ("διογένης ο κυνικός") as the "blatant Socrates". There are many evidence for the existance of Socrates.

These are the similarities that raised my curiosity to ask the question:

1) He lived his life teaching about the greatness of the soul and never was paid for it.

2) He never wrote a single word.

3) He had students who followed him and then wrote about his life and work.

4) Because his teaching was in conflict with the interests at the time, he accused him of blasphemy.

5) The court-people condemned him at the end of the sentences.

6) At the hearing, while he could say things that would be acquainted with him, he did not.

7) He had the opportunity to be saved, but he did not.

8) Before he died, he confessed that they did not know what they were doing and forgave them.

9) He was not afraid of his death.

10) He lived a humble and simple life.

11) After his death his disciples continued his work.

12) Too soon after his death, they realized the mistake they made to kill him.

...probably, if Socrates was escaping (he had the chance), now the Christianity was not going to be known.

I just need your valuable input/wisdom to answer the following question: Are there any information that would exclude such a possibility (that Jesus was affected by Socrates' life to such an extent that he tried to copy him).

I've just found an answer here about Imaginary Socrates: Was Socrates a fictional character invented by Plato?

closed as off-topic by Conifold, Not_Here, Mr. Kennedy, John Am, commando Apr 22 '17 at 9:26

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "While this question may be related to philosophy or occur in a philosophical context, the question itself doesn't seem to be about philosophy, and is therefore not a good fit for our site." – Conifold, Not_Here, Mr. Kennedy, John Am, commando
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    Jesus being a Jew, he was certainly under indirect Hellenistic influence through books and stories (whether in a written or oral tradition) from during and after the Babylonian exile. Several books in the Tanakh show these Hellenistic influences. So @Not_Here's comment about Roman influence in Israel seems only part of the story to me, although I agree with the points in his first comment. Another interesting question would be whether the writers of the New Testament wanted Jesus to look like Socrates. – user2953 Apr 21 '17 at 8:56
  • 1
    As for your approach to the question: shouldn't you be asking whether there is sufficient evidence to claim a direct link between the two, rather than whether there is sufficient evidence to reject that claim? – user2953 Apr 21 '17 at 8:56
  • At the theological level (and not: historical) you can see the English theologian, natural philosopher and chemist: Joseph Priestley with Socrates and Jesus Compared (1803). – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Apr 21 '17 at 9:19
  • 1
    @Not_Here definitely, I would expect any influence to be indirect, although this is not my field of expertise. – user2953 Apr 21 '17 at 9:47
  • 3
    How is this a question about philosophy? – Conifold Apr 21 '17 at 21:13

Did Jesus try to copy Socrates?

According to which of the numerous authors and editors of the life of Jesus of Nazareth?

The life of Jesus is largely the same as that of Socrates.

Some people say that both are fictional characters (for example, see the Carrier reference below).

I'm looking at the possibility that Jesus was affected by Socrates' life to such an extent that he tried to copy him. Are there any information that would exclude such a possibility?

I would recommend you consider, however, the logical status of fictional discourse and the lack of historical support for either Jesus of Nazareth as well as "the Socratic problem." In particular, I recommend the work of Dr. Richard Carrier regarding the lack of evidence supporting epistemic claims conjecturing any positive ontological status of Jesus from Nazareth.

"Like Socrates and Epictetus, he wrote nothing himself."
From Religious Views of Thomas Jefferson in the Preface to:
The Thomas Jefferson Bible

locked by user2953 Apr 23 '17 at 7:22

This post has been locked while disputes about its content are being resolved. You may discuss this on meta if you have concerns.

Read more about locked posts here.

  • Please provide proper references for your claim that they are both fictional characters. At least for Jesus, this is not a widely held claim (here for some references). You may also want to reformat to "Some people say that...". – user2953 Apr 22 '17 at 6:58
  • @Keelan see the cited lecture by Dr. Richard Carrier and the wikipedia article about the well known socratic problem. – Mr. Kennedy Apr 22 '17 at 7:02
  • OK, I edited it for you. If you have references that support the claim that according to everything we know both their lives are fictional (and this is not just a hypothesis held by a small minority), please edit them in. – user2953 Apr 22 '17 at 7:07
  • @Keelan feel free to cite one single counter-example (hint: you can not). This is simply an epistemic limitation which you can not edit away. See also the case studies of cargo cults and "John Frum" for empirical evidence supporting the creation of fictional characters in the same time frame from the purported life of Jesus to the first known writings regarding him. – Mr. Kennedy Apr 22 '17 at 7:10
  • From the link I gave you in my first comment: "An overwhelming majority of New Testament scholars and Near East historians, applying the standard criteria of historical investigation, find that the historicity of Jesus is more probable than not". I'm locking this post to resolve disputes about its content, to avoid flooding the front page with rollbacks. – user2953 Apr 22 '17 at 7:12

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.