Kant's theoretical work Perpetual Peace could be seen as limited insofar as he didn't really provide any detailed thoughts on the legislative and executive institutions that would make international law reality. Could it be said that he relies on the enlightened and moral republican public to make up for this? Explain how this strategy could work, and whether you think its sufficient.

closed as not constructive by iphigenie, Ben, Joseph Weissman Mar 19 '13 at 3:10

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    What did you mean with "publics"? The public of every single state? Or public figures? Also, could you maybe share what you found out already? Where does your idea come from, exactly? Could you provide the relevant passages? – iphigenie Nov 20 '12 at 10:30
  • This question seems some undergraduate homework. – Annotations Mar 1 '13 at 13:04