4

Could someone explain to me, in easy language, what the main differences are between Carnap and Quine's views regarding internal / external questions and realism? Quine called Carnap a Platoist, yet I don't understand why and what exactly the differences are.

Could someone elaborate, please?

  • 1
    See Quine's objections to Carnap. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jul 3 '17 at 5:59
  • I find that highly complex material. I need someone to explain it to me in a clear and concise way, but thanks, Mauro. – Siyah Jul 3 '17 at 11:18
  • 1
    Why do you think that a very complex issue like de debate Carnap-Quine about analytic sentences vs synthetic sentences, holism and a priori can be explained "in easy language" ? – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jul 3 '17 at 11:23
  • 1
    Because I think that everything can be explained in easy language :) Especially using examples makes it easy too. – Siyah Jul 3 '17 at 11:46
  • 1
    According to Carnap, analytic truths are true as a result of their meaning. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jul 3 '17 at 11:54
1

To Carnap being a realist is no more than opting for the vocabulary/language of realism. According to Carnap's principle of tolerance there are no truth-relevant arguments in favour of realism and against a form of anti-realism. From his empiricist stance, whether one chooses a realist or an anti-realist vocabulary/language does not make any difference to any truth-relevant, thus empiristic, problem and hence to the theory formulated in this language. The question of whether realism or anti-realism is correct is a pseudo-problem (Scheinproblem).

Quine does not distinguish between language/vocabulary (analytic sentences) and theory (synthetic sentences). The choice of language/theory is based on the precision of its predictions. Physics, the paradigm of a successful theory, makes claims for reality. Quine does not see any reason to disdain "exists" in a theory that works as well as physics. In fact, one might say that the success of a language/theory like physics with respect to predictions exactly stems from the fact that it is very precise when it comes to claim the existance of things. Hence, there really is matter in space-time.

To Carnap, the question of what language to choose is an external question. The question of what sentences are true, thus of what theory we accept in this language, in turn, is an internal question. As for Quine language and theory are inextricable, there are only internal questions. "We are like sailors who must rebuild their boat on the open sea, without ever being able to put into dock and reconstruct it from the best components." as he quotes Neurath at the beginning of Word and Object. According to Quine, philosophical questions must be treated as scientific questions and thus internally. According to Carnap, (most) philosophical questions are external pseudo-questions.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.