1

I’m reading Introduction to Logic by Harry J. Gensler. I reached to Part Two, Chapter 7, Propositional Proofs (Easier proofs, s- and l-rules, RAA, how to derive, refutation…etc.)

What is the difference between what I did and what the author did?

here is the question: enter image description here

and here is the writer's answer: enter image description here

and here is my answer:

enter image description here

0
2

Your step 7 is wrong.

See Contraposition: (∼W ⊃ ∼G) is equivalent to (G ⊃ W).

From (∼W ⊃ ∼G) and G we cannot validly infer ∼W. Consider the case when G and W are both TRUE: in this case the premises (∼W ⊃ ∼G) and G are TRUE but the conclusion ∼W is FALSE.

2
  • Thanks for your help. It seems that the book did not refer to this point that you mentioned, and that is why I made a mistake in my answer. I think I misunderstood the words of the writer (page 148): here image.ibb.co/jgYEfw/Capture.png Nov 11 '17 at 15:31
  • 1
    @MohammadAltamimi - exactly: see bottom left: from (∼A ⊃ ∼B) and B, derive A. Nov 11 '17 at 16:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.