Logic is generally regarded as dealing with laws of thought.
Then question rises whether the range of the laws of thought could be determined within the range of laws of thought
My question is not that so general
and I don't think this could be properly held in this line
but concrete; i.e.
"Wherein lies the difference of logic and psychology"
"Wherein lies the difference of logic and mathematics"
[I personally believe symbolic logic is mathematics and could not be discerned from it although the impetus of it could have been risen from laws of thought but it is not essentially different from the fact that mathemtics could arise from technical necessity]
These may throw a light into the above question.