2

We learn then we forget. It might seem to be a waste of precious time subtracted from life. Some time ago I started to write every day two things (yes, only two) I learn every day. One column for thing things that are totally new to me and other column for updates.

What is your method to not forget?

Or should I just do not care about it? It=learning

After all beauty does not need much of knowledge ☺

  • 2
    What exactly is your question regarding philosophy? As I read it, this is more of a philosophical question, which cannot be answered objectively and is hence a bad fit for SE. – Philip Klöcking Apr 12 '18 at 14:01
  • I am sorry to totally disagree with you. This has answers. We might have 70 years of life. It is a total waste of time if (1) somebody thought about this, (2) she/he has some good contribution for the solution and (3) he/she is willing to share such contribution AND me and others that have the similar questions can not benefit from her/him contributions. ☺ if somebody who uses SE has contributions to give is very welcome. – KwanzaKymi Apr 15 '18 at 6:12
  • Your title question is different from the question asked in the body of Q. As formulated, it also seems to be more oriented towards psychology/neurosciences than philosophy. – Gnudiff Apr 15 '18 at 7:22
  • Regarding your first point I disagree. Regard your second point it is neutral to me. – KwanzaKymi Apr 17 '18 at 11:52
2

I feel like you’re inching towards the paradox of learning, a very important problem for especially ancient Philosophy. —You could think of it from a teacher’s perspective:

Some of the students don’t need your help; and the remainder can’t or won’t benefit from it.

So why become a teacher? Indeed this problem cuts to the very possibility of learning anything at all. How could you learn something if don’t already know about it; how would you know where to “look”? This is in a way a bootstrapping problem.

For Plato, the solution has to do with reminiscence; all apparent learning is remembering, owing to a kind of transcendent Memory oriented towards a “past beyond the past”. Hence: you knew all this before birth; what you perceive as learning is only remembering.

  • Thank you for expanding my views with your comment. So, if "learning" is NOT The thing what could it be, please? – KwanzaKymi Apr 15 '18 at 6:15
  • For Plato, “it” would be the Memory of the forms’ imprint on your soul... – Joseph Weissman Apr 18 '18 at 21:48
  • That is a cool though. Thank you for that. Please, educate me a bit further. How would the "means" such as Memory and Learning [the forms imprinted in the soul] would serve the "objective(s) of life"? Is the objective(s) of life imprinted as well? – KwanzaKymi Apr 20 '18 at 1:19
  • For Plato, I think we might be talking about Knowledge or the Good — something like the Sun which illuminates the forms. (But again this circles back to the paradox; how can you teach someone to be good?) – Joseph Weissman Apr 20 '18 at 2:37
  • Good point. Thank you. Can a person forget what is good? – KwanzaKymi Apr 23 '18 at 7:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.