1

General Parker orders a curfew citywide to reduce crime rate.

While curfew is on effect, General Parker's soldiers caught a violator and took him to detention center.

While in detention center, the other inmates ganged up on the violator and beat him, up. And he died.

Therefore, General parker's is to be blame, since the violator wouldn't have died if he didn't end up in a detention center because of the curfew

1
1

The violator wouldn’t have died if the inmates hadn’t ganged up on him. The inmates are to be blamed.

The violator wouldn’t have died if the soldiers had taken good care of him at the detention center. The soldiers are to be blamed.

The violator wouldn’t have died if the violator had not violated the curfew in the first place. The violator is to be blamed.

The violator wouldn’t have died if the General, who is responsible for the operation of the detention center, had taken good supervision of the detention center to prevent any unacceptable incident.

I agree with Conifold that the General should share some of the blame for not taking good supervision of the detention center but not for ordering the curfew.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.