Considering the discussion on free-spirit by creating its own value system, how Nietzsche relate "free-spirit" and "slave morality"(its depth and its evilness)?

  • 1
    See On the Genealogy of Morality : First Treatise: Good and Evil', 'Good and Bad' where "Nietzsche demonstrates that the two opposite pairs "good/evil" and "good/bad" have very different origins, and that the word "good" itself came to represent two opposed meanings. In the "good/bad" distinction, "good" is synonymous with nobility and everything which is powerful and life-asserting; – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jul 29 '18 at 13:17
  • in the "good/evil" distinction, which Nietzsche calls "slave morality", the meaning of "good" is made the antithesis of the original aristocratic "good", which itself is re-labelled "evil". " – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jul 29 '18 at 13:18
  • There are two kinds of morality acc. to Nietzsche, "Slave morality" and "Master morality". Then "good / bad" and "good / evil" distinctions come to play. But there is an another group, "free spirit" . They are seperated themselves from the tension of the moral values of the dominate group. My question is: what kind of person are they? They have free spirits but to have a free spirit, you have to gain it. How this group gain their freedom? – 4pie0 Jul 29 '18 at 14:34
  • But N is not completly aligning itself with free spirits, because "all these pale atheists, Antichrists, immoralists, nihilists, these skeptics" have not become truly “free” from the counter-natural tradition of the ascetic ideal. These modern figures “are very far from being free spirits: because they still believe in truth.” [see Essay Three, §24]. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Jul 29 '18 at 17:02

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.