0

If the Block Universe is true, and if the Rebound Universe is also true where the universe goes from Big Crunch to Big bang then doesn't that mean that the Block Universe is shaped like a circle where history repeats the exact same way and so do we - therefore wouldn't that verify Nietzsche's Eternal Return theory to be true?

  • Please specify your train of thought. Would a built block of time traversed in a direction reverse to its build-direction and ( after the next Crunch) in build-direction be a rewind /replay of the first happenings? Is that it? How would that differ from an eternalist view? Why is the block theory of time needed here? Also, do you envison spacetime after the Crunch to be a mirror image if before? Why? Etc. – bukwyrm Jul 27 '18 at 4:58
  • I edited my question – user202315 Jul 27 '18 at 5:09
  • If x and y theory are true does that not verify z theory? First if all, theories are not true. They may fit the available data best, but what makes them (good) theories is being falsifiable. Second, your edit was miniscule. Please talk at length about your understanding of the block theory and the reboind theory, and how that would give credence to nietzsches theory (is that one even falsifiable?) – bukwyrm Jul 27 '18 at 5:48
  • I'm so sorry to read that you're experiencing such a deep mental health crisis. It's not clear to me whether you've sought counseling for help. If you haven't done that already, I encourage you to do so. I hope things turn around for you soon. – Dan Hicks Jul 27 '18 at 14:12
  • 1
1

Nietzsche's eternal return is a thought experiment for his existentialist ethics, not a metaphysical hypothesis. Roughly, the idea is that, as I reflect on the decisions that I've made in life, I imagine that my life will endlessly repeat in exactly the same way. If this thought makes me happy or excited, because I get to endlessly relieve my great triumphs and accomplishments, then I've lived well.

Nietzsche doesn't care whether or not the eternal return is actually true. It's a heuristic to evaluate the quality of our lives.

Now, in terms of physics, general relativity does allow the existence of "closed timelike curves." The basic idea is similar to science fiction stories (movies, TV shows) that feature "time loops" as a plot device. However, in those stories, the protagonist has some way to carry information from one loop to the next, usually deja vu or a vague memory. That wouldn't be the case with actual closed timelike curves. Closed timelike curves aren't like a dog chasing her tail, spinning around and around. They're more like a statue of a snake with her tail in her mouth. There aren't actually iterations or loops of the closed timelike curve; it's just that spacetime is structured in a closed circle.

Closed timelike curves are possible in general relativity, but AFAIK they require very specific arrangements of matter, and have never been observed in the real world. (IIRC the original example to show they were possible had a universe full of motes of dust spinning in a particular pattern.) So there's no reason to think that we are living in a closed timelike curve.

  • And will living in a closed timelike curve never happen for us? – user202315 Jul 28 '18 at 8:24
  • Again, closed timelike curves are possible in general relativity, but there's no reason to think we're living in one. And, insofar as they require very specific arrangements of matter, there's good reason to think that we're not living in one. – Dan Hicks Jul 28 '18 at 17:03

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.