2

In some circumstances, existence cannot be expressed in linear temporal logic. I don't understand why it can't be constructed with negations and global quantifiers.

For example, the wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_temporal_logic) states that:

No formula in LTL can define the language that is defined by the CTL formulas AG( p → (EXq ∧ EX¬q) ) or AG(EF(p)).

Why isn't the CTL formula AG(EF(p)) equivalent to the LTL formula G(¬G(¬p)) ?

  • Are you sure this is a philosophy question? This is more of a programming question than philosophy. That said, LTL is a subset of CTL which is in-turn a subset of CTL*, however, just because LTL is a subset it does not mean every relation holding in LTL holds in the supersets as well. My two cents. – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost Dec 3 '18 at 6:21

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.