Since I don't have any philosophy background, please answer as simply as you can! Thank you!

New contributor
mohammad-ghasemi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.

put on hold as off-topic by Bread, virmaior, Mauro ALLEGRANZA, Not_Here, Eliran Dec 6 at 18:41

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "While this question may be related to philosophy or occur in a philosophical context, the question itself doesn't seem to be about philosophy, and is therefore not a good fit for our site." – virmaior, Not_Here, Eliran
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    This is rather a question for etymologists. My opinion is that 'false' is an un-nuanced.. bare status.. whereas untrue is slightly pejorative... Meaning 'a lie'.. or possibly an accidental mistake. Either way... Untrue is a more emotive word. – Richard Dec 6 at 0:54
  • 1
    I wonder if there may be some distinction between false and untrue if one considers paradoxes. The paradox would not definitely be false. Perhaps the most it would be is untrue. – Frank Hubeny Dec 6 at 1:14
  • 2
    This may be a duplicate: philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/38542/29944 – Frank Hubeny Dec 6 at 1:22
  • Quoting from a comment in the other post: 'Google "law of excluded middle"' – Tim kinsella Dec 6 at 2:51
  • See dictionary : untrue : not according with the facts : FALSE. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Dec 6 at 7:08
up vote 1 down vote accepted

mohammad-ghasemi, welcome to PSE.

A dictionary will tell you that 'untrue' = 'false'. But your question is about conceptual distinctions expressed in ordinary language. A dictionary does not always do justice to such distinctions. Nor is the matter to be settled by saying by the principle of bivalence in logic that there are only two truth values - true and false - so that 'untrue' can only mean 'false'. Ordinary usage is the key here, neither dictionaries nor logical principles. It's a question of how a language community uses language.

I think we use 'false' when we want to assert the contradictory of a true statement or at least of a statement we take to be true. 'I met X last week' (true); 'I did not meet X last week' (false). The sentence 'I met X last week' is at least by ordinary language standards not vague, ambiguous, lacking in a unique meaning. So if it is true, there is a clear contradictory,' I did not meet X last week', which is false.

In contrast we use 'untrue' when e.g. vagueness creeps in. In a familiar example, due to JL Austin, 'France is hexagonal'. I don't want to say simply that this statement is false, because there is a vague sense in which France is hexagonal. So instead of saying, 'It's false that France is hexagonal', I say 'It's untrue that France is hexagonal' - meaning that it is not strictly (geometrically) true that France is hexagonal but not simply (in common sense, everyday terms) false either.

'False' indicates definite, unqualified error; 'untrue' suggests that the statement does not have a unique meaning and cannot be endorsed as it stands. So I might say, 'France is hexagonal' is untrue because it is not geometrically hexagonal but it is approximately hexagonal on the map. 'Untrue' qualifies my rejection; 'false' does not.

In referring to vagueness I have in mind only one way in which the false/ untrue distinction might come into play. This is not a full account; I'm sure other angles are possible.

I went to the market where I ate an apple.
Did I go to the market?
"Yes" = true
"No" = false
"I ate an apple" = untrue

Untrue is equivalent to the expression "that's not even wrong!"

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.