What difference is there between scientifically testable premises and personal biases that are tested?
That's, when is it possible to do scientific probing that is not somehow subjectively-oriented?
It seems intuitively that at least values must be entangled in everything. Even if some physics research had some sense of "objectivity" in terms of measurements, the action of "doing research" is a value choice.
Further, what does this mean for scientific investigation? Should the amount of premises/assumption be as small as possible? In order to not complicate the "possible interpretations"? But how could one discover patterns based on a large number of variables, unless one studies a large number of variables? Should the experiment design base on trying to select an approach that best suits the given resources and the goal in mind?