Why or How?
Which one of them do we use in Philosophy to understand and describe the world around us? More simply, which one do we prefer more and why? In physics, more likely, we use HOW to know how things really are around us. But I don't know which it is in Philosophy.

closed as too broad by Geoffrey Thomas Jan 31 at 21:33

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • I don't think that the question is too broad. But it needs more effort. – Ram Tobolski Feb 1 at 15:29
  • You may want to look at Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Jacques Maritain, if you have these interests. Here are some readings in the subject. maritain.nd.edu/jmc/aristotl.htm – Gordon Feb 1 at 15:30

Though both of these words have very great significance in philosophy, when philosophy is just for thinking and analyzing I would give more preference to 'Why'. But when it comes to application level I would give equal importance to 'How' also.

You may choose this question itself a sample and verify whether more sensible questions regarding this come under 'Why' or 'How'.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.