I want to know if there is a fallacy in this type of conversation.
CA=Country A and HRA=Human Right Association
CA: it is now gonna be forbidden in CA for feminist to express their feminism and if we catch one she will pass 2 months in jail.
HRA: You can't do that because you are violating their human right of expressing themselves.
CA: The HRA is not the one leading our Country we got representative carrying about those types of question and in the name of what should feminist have the Right to express themselves ?
Note that in this context feminists are not a threat to the society or institution of Country A.
Thanks for your help 😉