Has the Free Will Theorem of Conway and Kochen been taken seriously by the philosophical community? Is compatibilism still considered a valid approach to free will?

  • 7
    welcome! Do you think you could provide a little more context here?
    – Joseph Weissman
    Jun 25 '11 at 15:12

That theorem (overview) is often taken out of context. His suggestive naming of the behavior or elementary particles as "free will" irked a lot of people, especially as the connection to what we consider free will is phenomenally vague. It's almost akin to noting that Heisenberg Uncertainty suggests a lack of determinism (for the more quantum-mechanically literate, look into Bell's Theorem).

So the theorem is taken very seriously, but not necessarily having anything to do with what we consider free will.


Mixedmath's answer is a good one. I'd also like to add this supplementary data from a physicist point of view. As Sheldon Goldstein said: "We point out that for stochastic models this conclusion is not correct, while for deterministic models it is not new."


Besides, even if you stick to the non-compatiblist world view there are other points to be made for freewill than just indeterminism. I've written a bastardised argument in my blog for a general target audience.

  • Can you link directly to the argument in your blog? I don't think people on here are going to go to the effort to look for it.
    – Muhd
    Nov 10 '11 at 4:24
  • 1
    @Muhd I took the liberty to find Sina's argument and adjust the link
    – artm
    Jan 19 '13 at 16:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.