When is it accurate to say that a person (P) knows that X is true/accurate?
This question seems to be answered by the idea/concept of 'Pragmatic Encroachment';
The basic idea/concept of 'Pragmatic Encroachment' is answered to a limited extent”;
The basis for when it is accurate to say that a person knows X seems to me like it would be the same as the basis for when X is accurate.
The fundamental basis for what makes X true/accurate seems to me like it would also be the basis for when is it accurate/true to say that a person (P) knows that X is true/accurate.
The fundamental basis for what makes X true/accurate appears like it would also be;
The basis for when is it accurate/true to say that a person (P) knows that X is true/accurate;
The basis for why something is accurate/true seems to me like it would be the same.
How is the basis for X being accurate different from the basis of when it is accurate to claim that someone knows X?
Asked differently, are there any examples for when the basis for what makes X accurate is not the same basis for when it is accurate to say that a person knows that X is accurate?
I just cannot think of any examples where the fundamental basis for X being accurate/true would be different from the fundamental basis for when it'd be accurate to say that a person knows X is accurate/true;
I can't think of any examples for how or when this is possible. i don't how there could be a different fundamental basis for each, and for the whole system/paradigm of any given theories to still then be consistent, coherent & stable;
And if there wasn't any difference, distinction, or significant difference, then i dont understand why 'Pragmatic Encroachment' exist or what purpose it'd serve;
Here's a quick, simple example to illustrate:
Say the basis for the earth going around the sun is the science of astronomy;
Then the basis to accurately say that a person knows that the earth is going around the sun would also have to be the science of astronomy;
Because the science of astronomy is what actually makes X (the earth going around the sun) accurate/true;
I dont know how anyone could claim any other basis for a person knowing X that is different from what actually makes X accurate/true;