Modus celaront is type logical syllogism.
No reptiles have fur. (MeP) All snakes are reptiles. (SaM) ∴ Some snakes have no fur. (SoP)
The conclusion is of a O type(Some .. are not ...). Why is that should the correct conclusion not be of type E (No snakes have fur)?
On this link there is all in the parenthesis, but why can't we clearly say it?
I understand the felapton syllogism:
No flowers are animals. (MeP) All flowers are plants. (MaS) ∴ Some plants are not animals. (SoP)
I do not understand why we cannot assert that the E conclusion.