I'm looking through the lecture notes for my course on modal logic and am having a hard time understanding why it is that U, the class of all Universal frames, is a subset of E, the class of all Equivalence frames. I understand that all universal relations are equivalence relations and that not all equivalence relations are universal, but then do not see how the following assertion follows:

"If φ is valid in E, then since U is a subset of E, φ is valid in U." Wouldn't it be possible that φ is valid in U but not in E, since not there are some relations in E that are not in U?

I guess I'm thinking of U being a subset of E as the implication, "If U then E," which perhaps is not the correct way of thinking about it? Alternatively, I suppose we can consider the set of binary relations in each frame; then, if for x to be a subset of y is for all of the members of x to be members of y, wouldn't we have that E is a subset of U? As all of the binary relations in E are in U but U has many more relations?

Thanks in advance for any insight into the question itself and into the definitions involved.


A sentence p is valid in a class of frames C iff p is true in every frame in the class. The point, informally, is that when there are more frames there are fewer sentences true in all of them. In particular, if C is a subclass of D then every sentence true in every frame in D is also true in every frame in C (since every frame in C is a frame in D), so anything valid in D is valid in C, but there might be sentences not valid in D which only fail in frames in D-C so are valid in C.

For a simple example, let C be the class of all reflexive frames, and D the class of all frames. Then C validates the sentence p->Diamond(p), but D doesn't (consider a frame with no arrows at all).

So since U is a subclass of E, the set of sentences valid in U is a superset of the set of sentences valid in E.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.