1

I'm a mathematician. I'm considering reading Emmanuel Kant's famous Critique of Pure Judgement to help me think. I care more about the ideas rather than the ways of his presentation, which I'm not literate enough to appreciate.

In mathematics, one does not go read historic papers from 19th century to learn linear algebra. Instead, we read textbooks that are written for pedagogical purposes where ideas are presented in more attainable, intuitive manner. Do we have such books for Critique of Pure Judgement, given its significance?

0

P.D. Ouspensky's Tertium Organum has this extract from Kant’s CPR in the starting chapter.

The entire book can be considered to be…

Mathematico-mystical variations on the Kantian theme

Nothing which is intuited in space is a thing in itself, and space is not a form which belongs as a property to things; but objects are quite unknown to us in themselves, and what we call outward objects arc nothing else but mere representations of our sensibility, whose form is space, but whose real correlate, the thing in itself, is not known by means of these representations, nor ever can be, but respecting which, in experience, no inquiry is ever made. . . .

The things which we intuit are not in themselves the same as our representations of them in intuition, nor are their relations in themselves so constituted as they appear to us; and if we take away the subject, or even only the subjective constitution of our senses in general, t hen not only the nature and relations of objects in space and time, but even space and time themselves disappear. . . .

What may be the nature of objects considered as things in themselves and without reference to the receptivity of our sensibility is quite unknown to us. We know nothing more than our mode of perceiving them. . . . Supposing that we should carry our empirical intuition [sensory perception] even to the very highest degree of clearness, we should not thereby advance one step nearer to the knowledge of the constitution of objects as things in themselves. . . .

To say, then, that all our sensibility is nothing but the confused representation of things containing exclusively that which belongs to them as things in themselves, and this under an accumulation of characteristic marks and partial representations which we cannot distinguish in consciousness, is a falsification of the conception of sensibility and phenomenization, which renders our whole doctrine thereof empty and useless.

Is Ouspensky a serious philosopher or a mystic or a wild fantasist I'll leave you to judge 😇.
What can be agreed upon is that he uses a math-format...

As Fact? Truth?? Allegory??? I wont judge


Following @Conifold, I suggest you edit your question to change Judgement to Reason

  • It is exactly this kind of "dry talking" without any examples that makes Kant unreadable. When you use a word such as "intuit", it is necessary for you to give an example so that people understand what exactly you mean. – Daniel Li Sep 25 at 3:32
  • @DanielLi I suspect Kant is 'drier' in English than German... But that is for some English-German bilingual to affrim assertively. – Rusi-packing-up Sep 25 at 3:42
  • Looks like a good summary to me, albeit of only one issue. For myself I cannot see much point in expanding it to match the more careful and complete presentation given by Kant when the original text is available. This summary allows one to get the gist. Ouspensky is an odd character known for his misunderstanding of Gurdjieff's philosophy. He has 'mystical' leanings and sensibilities but never quite 'groks' the message. A philosopher maybe but not a mystic except in an aspirational sense. . – PeterJ Sep 26 at 16:11
  • @DanielLi I am surprised that a mathematician rants about someone who writes about concepts so abstract that it is hard to give corresponding examples at all. ZxZ spaces are not exactly intuitively understood. Intuition in Kant is perceptual input not yet "understood". Also, Kant did write the Prolegomena as an introduction, which tries to gradually lead the reader from common experience to the level of abstraction the CPR starts with. – Philip Klöcking Oct 26 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.