I understand well what are synthetic a priori jugements and what are maths / sciences synthetic a priori jugements. But I want to know examples of philosophical (metaphysical) synthetic a priori jugements. It seems Kant never says it explicitly ?

Thank you.


The philosopher that coinded the concept of " a priori synthetic judgment" , that is, Kant, held the thesis that metaphysics proper does not contain such judgments.

According to Kant, there is no substantive possible knowledge regarding (1) the Soul ( the alledged thinking substance) (2) the World (3) or God.

But, with a more modest meaning of " metaphysics" one can talk about metaphysical a priori synthetic judgments.

Metaphysics, in the critical sense, is the theory that deals with the possibility conditions of experience. These conditions are a priori and are expressed in the " principles of pure understanding". The principle of these principles is that " the possibility conditions of experience are also the possibility conditions of the objects of experience".

You will find them in the Critique of Pure Reason :

(1) axioms of intuition

(2) anticipations of perception

(3) analogies of experience ( for example, the causality principle)

(4) postulates of empirical thought in general

  • 1
    Thank you for your explanation. But even "Pure reason does not have any synthetic a priori judgment" itself is not a synthetic a priori judgment ? – hawarden_ Jan 6 '20 at 22:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.