In current philosophy, what are the main strands of argumentation when it comes to substantiating naturlistic moral realism?

My question may be rephrased into: How would you argue?

  • "How would you argue" is off-topic here, but SEP surveys how philosophers proposed to reconcile moral facts with naturalism, particularly in connection with Moore's argument against their compatibility.
    – Conifold
    Mar 13 '20 at 22:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.