In current philosophy, what are the main strands of argumentation when it comes to substantiating naturlistic moral realism?

My question may be rephrased into: How would you argue?

  • "How would you argue" is off-topic here, but SEP surveys how philosophers proposed to reconcile moral facts with naturalism, particularly in connection with Moore's argument against their compatibility.
    – Conifold
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 22:38


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .