0

Is there a concept that refers to phenomena that are caused or seemingly caused by something outside the physical realm? I am referring to phenomena that seems to have been shown to be caused by something outside the physical realm, or the quantum realm, if the quantum realm is considered to be separate of the physical realm. The experiment showing that no discernible cause (invisible matter or force that cannot be perceived or detected), we would use the concept to refer to the possibility that the cause must be external of our universe or physical realm.

  • 3
    There is a concept for the negation of what you ask, the completeness of the physical, a.k.a. causal closure of the physical. Events unexplainable by physical causes are typically called miracles. No uncontroversial examples of miracles have been presented so far. – Conifold Jul 30 at 6:52
  • Needs to be clarified.When you say "something outside the physical realm", is it the noumena? In such case, there you have the name, or "thing-in-itself". Otherwise, do you refer to something else, which exceeds phenomena and the noumena? I can't imagine what; I don't agree with Conifold in such object being something else than the noumena (i.e. God). – RodolfoAP Jul 30 at 8:13
  • The word for the >>concept<< would be either paracausal or acausal (google them for elaboration). Random quantum events are typically described/characterized as acausal, but the word itself isn't limited to that realm. So those are the words, but whether or not the world actually harbors such paracausal/acausal phenomena in your intended sense is debatable. – John Forkosh Jul 30 at 11:35
  • John's comment suggests a possible ambiguity in the OP. Causal closure does not rule out "acausal" events that are not determined by prior events. It only claims that no other causes exist beyond the physical ones, which is what the question seems to be about. Quantum random events are consistent with that unless one assumes that there are some extra-physical causes that determine the outcomes. However, the standard interpretation is that there are none, such events simply do not have sufficient causes, physical or otherwise, they are "truly random". – Conifold Jul 30 at 20:44
  • You may wish to peruse this, to some extent parallel, post. philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/75530/… – gonzo yesterday
-2

Not necessarily ‘outside’ the physical universe, more like ‘not understood’ or not ‘publicly known’ within this universe. If you’re wondering or need to explain your side to receive a better answer, contact me. Consider metaphysics and the possibility of 4th dimensional interference while humans can only perceive three (l x w x h).

| improve this answer | |
New contributor
Emero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
  • @wedecide ‘not understood’ and not ‘publicly known’ suggest that there is a physical explanation yet to be discovered. Your question appears to exclude such explanations. Can you clarify your question so that it is consistent with the answer you ticked? Either that, or tick a different answer instead. – Guy Inchbald Aug 2 at 16:04
  • It’s not a answer deserving of the public to hear. Context specific, the only person that needs the answer is the person that asked. Others display no need of knowing so it is not my place to divulge the information publically. – Emero Aug 3 at 17:04
  • If there is a name for the ‘concept’, it would be the concept of paranormal/abnormal occurrence unbeknownst to the majority of mankind, by definition of normal referring to that which is already widely known to be explained. – Emero Aug 3 at 17:10
3

I believe you mean "magic" - or "supernatural" events or entities. While I would be somewhat dismissive of such claims, the majority of people in the world believe in such phenomena. In the USA, a 2007 poll found that 19 percent of Americans believe in “spells or witchcraft,”
23% say they have actually seen a ghost or believe they have been in one’s presence, 34% of people who say they believe in ghosts, 35% of people who say they believe in UFOs. (common parlance for space-alien 'visitors') 64% of people believe in a personal God or Gods who interacts with us/talks to people.

| improve this answer | |
New contributor
Noah Edelson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
1

The quantum realm is not to be considered as a different realm, our reality is made up of quantums. It's only a different scale, at which certain physical properties ct different on the elements of that "size".

The most general concept for "strange" causation from outside the physical world is "paranormal", though it may include events that are just unexpected, like alien visits.

Various other realms have been proposed. I. Philosophy, 'dualism' refers to the notion that human actions in the physical realm are caused by mental actions in the separate mental realm.

The words "transcendental" and "qualia" can indicate elements of other realms (out just things that cannot be described in terms of physics).

In religion diverse non-physical realms are suggested or implied, like paradise, hell, Nirvana, the afterlife, the eternal hunting grounds, and so on. Those might be said to interact with the physical world, sometimes. Though I am not aware of a unifying concept, other than reusing "dualism".

| improve this answer | |
0

Idealism? In Kant's modern idealism, for example, the "phenomena" are related to or in some sense "caused" by "noumena," the Ding an Sich or thing-in-itself. These noumenal entities are beyond direct knowledge or any firm basis of judgment, thus beyond what we might call the physical realm of causality and other laws of physics. How exactly these material and ideal realms are connected remains problematic, as in Cartesian dualism. For Kant, the self or subject may itself be noumenal and is thus endowed with freedom, which Kant describes as a different type of "nonphysical" causality. This probably isn't what you were looking for. But in a sense all of idealism from Plato on would require the sort of terminology sought in your question. I'd agree too with Noah Edelson, above, that broadly "supernatural" is pretty much synonymous with visual, auditory, or other sense data from a "nonphysical" or metaphysical source. Not sure I agree about magic, however, which can be thought of as a sort of misdirected or unproven physics, manipulating forces in a physical continuum. But I doubt practitioners of magic agree upon, or even want, a clear definition of its bounds, which reach so luxuriously from card tricks to dread shapes summoned out of Spiritus Mundi.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.